1993 Fiat Vivace vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1993 Fiat Vivace is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1993 Fiat Vivace. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1993 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 500 kg more than 1993 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Fiat Vivace | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Vivace | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1993 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2960 mm |