1993 Ford Aerostar vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 700 kg more than 1993 Ford Aerostar.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Aerostar. (225 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Aerostar | 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Aerostar | ML |
Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2920 mm |