1993 Ford Aerostar vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1993 Ford Aerostar. (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 115 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Aerostar. (225 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Aerostar.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Ford Aerostar 2009 Suzuki Equator
Make Ford Suzuki
Model Aerostar Equator
Year Released 1993 2009
Body Type Minivan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2979 cc 3953 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 143 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 381 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1410 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 5600 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 3560 mm