1993 Ford Aspire vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Aspire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Aspire would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1993 Ford Aspire. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Aspire.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Aspire, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Aspire. (100 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Aspire. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1993 Ford Aspire has manual transmission. 1993 Ford Aspire will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Aspire | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Aspire | Calais |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |