1993 Ford Contour vs. 2010 Mazda 6

To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Contour would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1993 Ford Contour. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Contour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 259 kg more than 1993 Ford Contour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Contour. (180 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Contour.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Ford Contour 2010 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Contour 6
Year Released 1993 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1988 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 180 Nm 226 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1242 kg 1501 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1839 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2789 mm