1993 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Falcon (216 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Falcon weights approximately 241 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1993 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Falcon (365 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1993 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.

Compare all specifications: