1993 Ford Focus vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1993 Ford Focus is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Focus | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Focus | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1993 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1530 mm |