1993 Ford Focus vs. 1968 Rover 2000
To start off, 1993 Ford Focus is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Focus (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1968 Rover 2000. (142 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1968 Rover 2000.
Because 1968 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Focus (305 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Rover 2000. (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1993 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Ford Focus | 1968 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Focus | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 272 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1400 mm |
