1993 Ford Focus vs. 1970 Volvo 164
To start off, 1993 Ford Focus is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Focus (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1970 Volvo 164. (129 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1970 Volvo 164.
Because 1970 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Focus (305 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Volvo 164. (210 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1993 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Ford Focus | 1970 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Focus | 164 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1450 mm |
