1993 Ford Focus vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Focus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1993 Ford Focus. (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Focus.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Focus (305 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1993 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Focus | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Focus | CTS |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1422 mm |