1993 Ford Laser vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Laser would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1993 Ford Laser. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Laser.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Laser. (123 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Ford Laser | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Laser | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
