1993 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Mustang weights approximately 325 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1993 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Ford Mustang | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | Clio |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
