1993 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1993 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Mustang | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Mustang | I-290 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 74 L |