1993 Ford Royale vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 1993 Ford Royale is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Ford Royale | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Royale | 600 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |
