1993 Ford Royale vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Royale would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1993 Ford Royale. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Royale.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Royale | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Royale | Mustang |
Year Released | 1993 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 173 Nm | 556 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2580 mm |