1993 Ford Royale vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Royale would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1993 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Royale.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Royale. 2010 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1993 Ford Royale has manual transmission. 1993 Ford Royale will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Ford Royale 2010 Mazda CX-9
Make Ford Mazda
Model Royale CX-9
Year Released 1993 2010
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 109 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 173 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 5075 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1935 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1727 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2875 mm