1993 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1993 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 560 kg more than 1993 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Ford Tempo | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Tempo | Canyon |
Year Released | 1993 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3200 mm |