1993 Holden Commodore vs. 2002 BMW Z3

To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,987 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1993 Holden Commodore. (221 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1993 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Holden Commodore weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Holden Commodore (385 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z3. (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z3.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Holden Commodore 2002 BMW Z3
Make Holden BMW
Model Commodore Z3
Year Released 1993 2002
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4987 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 221 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 385 Nm 301 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2450 mm