1993 Honda Civic Del Sol vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 794 kg more than 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. (133 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol has manual transmission. 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Honda Civic Del Sol | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Honda | Cadillac |
| Model | Civic Del Sol | XTS |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 314 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.9 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 11.5 |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2831 mm |
