1993 Honda CRX vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Honda CRX would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Honda CRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Honda CRX (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Honda CRX (145 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Honda CRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Honda CRX | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | CRX | Ka |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |