1993 Hyundai Lantra vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Hyundai Lantra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Hyundai Lantra would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Hyundai Lantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Hyundai Lantra | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Hyundai | Cadillac |
Model | Lantra | CTS |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1504 mm |