1993 Hyundai Lantra vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Hyundai Lantra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Hyundai Lantra would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1993 Hyundai Lantra. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1993 Hyundai Lantra.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Hyundai Lantra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Hyundai Lantra. (129 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Hyundai Lantra.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Hyundai Lantra | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
Model | Lantra | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3010 mm |