1993 Jaguar 220 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar 220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar 220 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Jaguar | Cadillac |
Model | 220 | CTS |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2880 mm |