1993 Jaguar 220 vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar 220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Jaguar 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jaguar 220 | 2010 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Jaguar | Honda |
| Model | 220 | Fit |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3497 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1694 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2499 mm |
