1993 Jaguar 220 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar 220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Jaguar 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1993 Jaguar 220 has manual transmission. 1993 Jaguar 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar 220 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 220 | 6 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1839 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2789 mm |