1993 Jaguar 220 vs. 2012 BMW X5

To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar 220 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar 220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1993 Jaguar 220 has manual transmission. 1993 Jaguar 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Jaguar 220 2012 BMW X5
Make Jaguar BMW
Model 220 X5
Year Released 1993 2012
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3497 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 300 HP
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 8-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4854 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1933 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2933 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]