1993 Jaguar 220 vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar 220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Jaguar 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar 220 | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 220 | 3 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |