1993 Jaguar XJ vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar XJ | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
Model | XJ | 132 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 5993 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 464 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2560 mm |