1993 Jaguar XJ vs. 2002 MG ZT-T

To start off, 2002 MG ZT-T is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2002 MG ZT-T. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 MG ZT-T.

Because 1993 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG ZT-T. (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG ZT-T.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Jaguar XJ 2002 MG ZT-T
Make Jaguar MG
Model XJ ZT-T
Year Released 1993 2002
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5993 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 318 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 464 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78.5 mm 82.8 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2830 mm