1993 Jaguar XJ vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jaguar XJ | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Rover |
| Model | XJ | 75 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 5993 cc | 2497 cc |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 464 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |
