1993 Jaguar XJ vs. 2012 Citroen C3

To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3.

Because 1993 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Jaguar XJ 2012 Citroen C3
Make Jaguar Citroen
Model XJ C3
Year Released 1993 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5993 cc 1360 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 318 HP 87 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 464 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Top Speed 250 km/hour 175 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 3870 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 45 L