1993 Jaguar XJ vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jaguar XJ | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJ | 2 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5993 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 464 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 43 L |
