1993 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 1995 Rover 400 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 440 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (183 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar XJ220 | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XJ220 | 400 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 642 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 1390 mm |