1993 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1998 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1998 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 491 more horse power than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1998 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar XJ220 | 1998 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Jaguar | ZAZ |
Model | XJ220 | Wagon |
Year Released | 1993 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 1470 mm |