1993 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 468 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 534 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | 2003 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Proton |
| Model | XJ220 | 400 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 642 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 1390 mm |
