1993 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 469 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.

Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 537 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Jaguar XJ220 2005 Renault Clio
Make Jaguar Renault
Model XJ220 Clio
Year Released 1993 2005
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3498 cc 1149 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 542 HP 73 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 642 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Height 340 mm 1500 mm