1993 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2008 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC70 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 357 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC70. (185 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC70.
Because 2008 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo XC70. (542 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo XC70.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | 2008 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | XJ220 | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 642 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 349 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 1570 mm |
