1993 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 388 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar XJ220 | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ220 | 5 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 642 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 1640 mm |