1993 Jaguar XJS vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJS (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 1274 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJS (378 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1993 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jaguar XJS | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XJS | Extreme |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 378 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2420 mm |