1993 Jaguar XJS vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 5,996 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJS (309 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 461 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1993 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJS (476 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (231 Nm). This means 1993 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: