1993 Jaguar XJS vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJS would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jaguar XJS | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Smart |
| Model | XJS | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1867 mm |
