1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee (190 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 478 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jeep | Triumph |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3963 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1648 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |
