1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 338 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.
Because 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Omega |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3963 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1648 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 52 L |