1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2011 Ford Fusion is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Fusion weights approximately 39 kg more than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Fusion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3963 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1648 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4841 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |
