1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Jeep | SsangYong |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3963 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 302 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2970 mm |
