1993 Lincoln Continental vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 310 kg more than 1993 Lincoln Continental.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Lincoln Continental | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
| Model | Continental | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3799 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3270 mm |
