1993 Mahindra Armada vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Mahindra Armada is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mahindra Armada | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mahindra | Renault |
Model | Armada | Clio |
Year Released | 1993 | 1991 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3710 mm |