1993 Mahindra Armada vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 835 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mahindra Armada | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mahindra | Renault |
| Model | Armada | Clio |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3990 mm |
