1993 Mazda 121 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1993 Mazda 121 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 121. (71 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 121.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mazda 121. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda 121 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 121 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1993 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |