1993 Mazda 626 vs. 2001 Renault Clio

To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. Both 1993 Mazda 626 and 2001 Renault Clio are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda 626 weights approximately 208 kg more than 2001 Renault Clio.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Renault Clio (207 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (172 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Mazda 626 2001 Renault Clio
Make Mazda Renault
Model 626 Clio
Year Released 1993 2001
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 82.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 93 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 1062 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 50 L